なぜそんなことがまかり通ったのでしょう?私なりの回答は、厚労省、かつての厚生省ですが、ここは、悪名高き内務省から分離した行政部門であることです。山縣有朋以来の唯我独尊的文化を持って、デモクラシー、労働運動、共産主義を弾圧し、令状なく逮捕監禁し、拷問を加えた特高(特別高等警察)の体質を継承しているから。同様に現代の警視庁も内務省、特高の文化を継承していますので、憲法、法律とは無縁の独自の法解釈、行政を今日でも展開しています。厚生省の発足はたしか1933年です。戦後ではなく戦前に既に独立していました。なにがそれをうながしたのでしょうか。最近私なりに答えを見つけたような気がします。本日の話題はその源流です。(なお、内務省はGHQにより占領初期に解体されました。当然でしょうね。)
さて、本日の話題。先日ある本を読んでいたら驚きの記述がありました。世界最初の福祉国家はドイツだと考えられているそうです。その推進役はオットー・フォン・ビスマルクだそう。私には驚きでしたね。彼は国民の健康は健全な国家、徴兵制の要であると考えて、普通選挙を導入して庶民が政治に参加できるようにした、傷病兵に年金を支給し、死んだ兵士の家族には経済的援助を提供した----大衆の政治参加と福祉国家とは徴兵制というクルマの両輪である、と考えたそう。(『戦争と法』長谷部恭男2020)私がビスマルクに抱くイメージとは相当かけ離れた価値観が見えます。もしかすると彼は漠然と感じられ、知られているよりも、ずっと偉大な政治家なのかも知れません。
私はあまりドイツのことに詳しくありませんので、これ以上この件を知ろうとしてもどのような本を読めば良いのか見当が付きません。こんな時はChatGTPに訊くのが手っ取り早いでしょう。彼の回答を引用します:
なるほど。では、彼の後に続くナチズムは、これを破壊する方向に作用したのでしょうか。
The Nazi regime in Germany did not entirely destroy the welfare state programs established under Otto von Bismarck, nor did it enhance them in a way that would be consistent with the original intentions of social welfare. Instead, the Nazis manipulated and repurposed these programs to serve their ideological and political goals, while also expanding some aspects of welfare selectively.
The Welfare State Under Nazism
Ideological Manipulation: The Nazi regime reshaped welfare programs to align with its racist and totalitarian ideology. Social welfare became less about universal care and more about promoting the health and welfare of the "racially pure" Aryan population. Welfare programs were infused with propaganda, emphasizing the well-being of the "Volksgemeinschaft" (people's community) while excluding Jews, disabled individuals, and others deemed "undesirable."
Expansion of Certain Programs: The Nazis did expand certain welfare provisions, particularly those related to family support and health care for "Aryan" families. Programs like the "Mother and Child" assistance program were designed to increase birth rates among "racially pure" Germans. The regime also promoted public health initiatives, though these were often tied to eugenic policies, such as forced sterilizations.
Selective Welfare: The welfare state under Nazism was not dismantled, but it was selectively applied. The programs were restructured to exclude large segments of the population based on race, political affiliation, and physical or mental health. Welfare became a tool for social control, rewarding those who conformed to Nazi ideals and punishing those who did not.
Post-1945 Reconstruction of the Welfare State
After Germany's defeat in 1945, the welfare state was not rebuilt from scratch but underwent significant reform and restructuring.
Denazification and Reforms: In the immediate post-war period, the Allied occupation forces initiated a process of denazification, which included dismantling the Nazi influence on existing institutions, including welfare programs. The goal was to remove Nazi ideology and reestablish democratic principles in all areas of governance.
West Germany (Federal Republic of Germany): In West Germany, the welfare state was rebuilt and expanded in the post-war period, especially during the economic miracle (Wirtschaftswunder) of the 1950s and 1960s. The new welfare state was based on principles of social market economy (Soziale Marktwirtschaft), combining economic liberalism with social welfare protections. Programs such as pensions, unemployment benefits, health insurance, and family allowances were reinstated and expanded.
East Germany (German Democratic Republic): In East Germany, the welfare state took on a different character under communist rule. The government provided extensive social services, but these were closely tied to state control and the command economy. Welfare programs were universal, but they were also a means of ensuring political loyalty and suppressing dissent.
Conclusion
The Nazi regime did not destroy the welfare state but instead twisted it to serve its racist and totalitarian goals. After World War II, Germany did not start entirely from scratch but reformed and expanded the welfare state, particularly in West Germany, as part of the broader reconstruction and democratization efforts. Unquote.
ビスマルクは、大酒のみのガサツな大男のような印象でしたが、Chattieのコメントを読んで、彼の本来の持ち場であった外交面での活躍よりも、しっかりと庶民の方向を向いた、国家の大計をにらんだ、大物政治家であったというような印象を持ちました。もしこれが妥当な評価だとしても、続く20世の前半のヒトラーのナチズムはおそらくそれをかなりぶち壊したのですね。歴史とは一筋では進まず跛行(はこう)するものなのかも知れません。